Wisdom from Thomas Sowell
Larry Kotlikoff's comment on Paul Krugman's debating style in my previous post reminded me of an email I received earlier this summer:
If you're familiar with the basic premise of the book, you can
skip this paragraph. If you aren't (or need a refresher) Sowell creates a
spectrum of political visions. At one end, there is the unconstrained vision,
which sees a more malleable human nature in which the reason of
experts has great efficacy in solving society's problems. At the
other end, there is the constrained vision, which sees man's reason as
inherently limited to narrow fields, with the best social progress
coming through less deliberate and more evolutionary means. Sowell would
see you as closer to the perfectly constrained vision, and Professor
Krugman as closer to the perfectly unconstrained vision.
Here is the passage that reminded me of your debates with him. I
think you'll see what I mean:
Sincerity is so central to the unconstrained vision that it is
not readily conceded to adversaries, who are often depicted as apologists, if
not venal. It is not uncommon in this tradition to find references to their
adversaries' "real" reasons, which must be "unmasked." Even
where sincerity is conceded to adversaries, it is often accompanied by
references to those adversaries' "blindness," "prejudice,"
or narrow inability to transcend the status quo. Within the unconstrained
vision, sincerity is a great concession to make, while those with the
constrained vision can more readily make that concession, since it means so
much less to them. Nor need adversaries be depicted as stupid by those with the
constrained vision, for they conceive of the social process as so complex that
it is easy, even for wise and moral individuals, to be mistaken -- and
dangerously so. They 'may do the worst of things without being the worst of
man,' according to Burke. (pg 59-60)
You may have already seen
this and had similar thoughts, but if you hadn't, I thought you would find
it interesting.
Best,
Hi Professor Mankiw,
I'm an entering graduate student at [withheld] and a long-time reader
(reading your blog when I was in high school introduced me to and got me
interested in economics). I was reading Thomas Sowell's A Conflict of Visions and
stumbled upon a passage that immediately reminded me of you, and your debates
with Professor Krugman. I think it accurately describes a lot of
disputes I've seen among intellectuals.
[name withheld]
<< Home